written and diagramed by Tim Farley
first published in Stardate 4, August 1980
© 1980 by Tim Farley for Orion Press
All fans are familiar with references to course and bearings in Star Trek, such as "Mister Sulu, come to heading 550 mark 3" and other similar lines. However, the system behind these references has never been correctly or completely explained. Without going into an immense amount of detail, I shall explain the system and offer some proof to back it up.
Obviously, courses are stated as a pair of angles, a latitude and a longitude. These two numbers completely describe the vector along which the ship is traveling. To see how this is so, imagine yourself at the center of a great hollow globe. By stating the latitude and longitude of that point, you can uniquely describe the direction in which youre traveling, motion in one and only one direction will have you moving toward that point. Note that this is not a statement of position, only a direction of motion.
The following table contains, to my knowledge, every course and bearing used in the live action Star Trek episodes:
|14 mark 68 (WGD)
17 mark 4 (Dv)
28 mark 42 (UC)
32º mark 10 (DMa)
37 mark 010 (Psy)
70 mark 21 (DMa)
111 mark 14 (BT)
112 mark 5 (UC)
113 mark 5 (UC)
113 mark 7 (UC)
117 mark 2 (LZ)
|126 mark 20 (LZ)
127 mark 8 (TI)
143 mark 2 (ET)
143 mark 3 (LZ)
148 mark 3 (ET)
181 mark 7 (SGn)
185 mark 3 (EI)
188 mark 14 (DY)
210 mark 40 (Mt)
217 mark 5 (LZ)
224 mark 12 (Mt)
|257 mark 3 (DY)
307 mark 8 (IM)
310 mark 35 (Mt)
310 mark 41 (GT)
318 mark 7 (EI)
373 mark 8 (TI)
403 mark 7 (LB)
513 mark 7 (RM)
883 mark 41 (PSy)
902 mark 5 (Dv)
|0 mark 0
4 mark 7 (Cp)
"azimuth 24" (Cp)
27 mark 8 (JB)
"azimuth 87" (Ar)
"azimuth 963" (Ar)
94 mark 7, elev 6º (Ob)
111º elev. 4º (DD)
bearing 121 (MW)
123º mark 18 (Cg)
127 mark 9 (Ob)
bearing 201 (DD)
210 mark 12 (Cg)
300 mark 7 (AON)
mark 73.5" (ET)
|Miscellaneous:||Note: This article was written and published well before Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan was filmed.|
point..." Galileos course, cut off (GS)
164 mark 3 Lexingtons course (UC)
201 mark 15 Galileos course (Mt)
241 mark 17 Yonadas course (FW)
There are three things evident in the table. First, the first angles vary over a much wider range than the second ones do. Since any given star could be at any longitude from your position (there are stars all around us), but stars are confined in latitude to the disk of the galaxy (the Milky Way), it is obvious that the first coordinate is the longitude while the second, more restricted one is the latitude. Second, there are longitude values over 360 (sure, you can blame Freiburger, but that doesnt make them go away). Since the highest used was 902, I have decided to divide the circle into 1000 which allows it to fit right, in with our beloved metric system. Third, there are no negative latitude values, If the system was arranged like Earths latitude and longitude, you would expect an equal number of positive and negative latitude values. The chances of getting no negatives in our sample is between 4.29 billion and 2.25 quadrillion to one. Obviously, the system is arranged so latitude is never negative.
From any position within the galaxy, it is fairly easy to plot courses.
Imagine a plane parallel to the plane of the galaxy, but passing through your position. This is the "equator." "Up" will be the direction of the galactic north pole (N.G.P.) determined by astronomers. Draw a vector from your position in the direction that the nearest point on the edge of the galaxy is from Earth. This is the "zero vector." Longitude of any direction is measured counterclockwise from this vector.
Once you have found the longitude, the latitude is measured "down" from a line inclined 25º to the "equator" plane. Thus the latitude of a stellar destination, most likely located in the disk of the galaxy, will be between 0º and 50º. Latitudes run from 0º to 275º (straight down) and from 775º (straight up) to 1000º (equivalent to 0º ). Just as Earth latitudes are never greater than 90º or less than 90º, these latitude values are never between 275º and 775º.
Bearings to objects are found in exactly the same way. They are tied to the galaxy like courses are, and the orientation of the ship does not affect them. The ship could spin around in a circle, but the bearing of a stationary object would remain the same. Thus, the bearing of an object in the ships line of flight would be equal to the ships course. This arrangement greatly simplifies the coordination of sensors, helm and fire control. It also ties in with the use of the "navigation map" at the center of the helm.
This device displays the region surrounding the Enterprise constantly, with the ship represented by the center of the map at all times. The stars and objects on the map are constantly moving in the opposite direction as the ship, keeping its position updated. If you remember or watch the final scene in "Arena," you will see that this is so by Sulus comments. In any case, the bearings of and therefore courses to any objects are quickly obtainable by noting the objects position relative to the circular longitude scale which encircles the map.
Although this system was never explained in the original series, every time that courses have been stated which can be related to real stars or places in the galaxy, they fit right in with the system. A course determined for the planet killer in "The Doomsday Machine" makes the courses Decker uses frontal assaults, consistent with what he said he was doing. A course determined for the ship at the end of "The Changeling" puts her moving away from Earth, a means of delaying Nomad, should it escape. Courses stated in "The Ultimate Computer" put it moving away from Earth, the logical place for any type of war gaming. A position for the Klingon Empire which can be determined from a course in "Day of the Dove" is consistent with both the Klingon activity on Capella ("Fridays Child") and the course of the Enterprise in the motion picture. Finally, the actual position of the Coalsack fits in with the position stated (in course data) during "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield."
Here is the system in brief:
1) One circle equals 1000º.
2) Longitudes come first, counted counter-clockwise from the Sol-to-galaxy rim "zero vector".
3) The work "mark" separates the two angles.
4) Latitudes come second, measured down from a zero vector inclined 25º to the equator plane.
5) Shipboard bearings are found in exactly the same manner.
6) Landing party bearings are the same, with these exceptions:
a) The ground surface is the horizontal plane.
b) The zero vector runs from you to the north rotational pole of the planet, determined by tricorder.
c) The latitude coordinate reflects ground inclination. If the ground is level, the latitude is not stated, as in "bearing 201" or "azimuth 87."
d) Objects above the surfaces are located with an angle of "elevation." Noting rule c, this explains 94 mark 7, elevation 6 as well as "bearing 111º, elevation 4."
Some of you may remember (rare) references to a 360° system, such as "a 360° scan" in "The Mark of Gideon" and "180º about" in "The Galileo Seven." This is not necessarily an inconsistency, but instead, just another of the many 20th century "throwbacks" encountered in Trek as a result of the conservatism of the members of Starfleet. These terns have, through many years of use prior to the adoption of the 1000º system, become synonymous with a "complete circle" and "about face" respectively. This changing of the language is a natural thing, and has been seen in the past. It can also be used to explain such apparently inconsistent and anomalous terms as "quadrant" used in the original Star Trek.
Well, there it is, an example of how a pile of research, a little luck and some logic can build up consistent background material which fits the Star Trek universe in every way. Live long and prosper, and happy navigating!
Free counters provided by Andale.
here to return to the Articles Page.
Click here to return to the Main Index Page.